Wireless redstone :D
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 5:09 pm
(mc1110 and mc1111)They're confusing if you've never used them before, but they definitely work. If you need help setting them up, let me know
Page 1 of 1
Re: Wireless redstone :D
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2016 9:24 pm
We already have wireless redstone on the server because of the Transmitter and Receiver signs from craftbook (mc1110 and mc1111)
They're confusing if you've never used them before, but they definitely work. If you need help setting them up, let me know
(mc1110 and mc1111)They're confusing if you've never used them before, but they definitely work. If you need help setting them up, let me know
Re: Wireless redstone :D
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 12:30 am
Decided to snoop on forums while waiting for something and came across this.
While craftbook is enabled, last i knew, IC's are disabled due to performance. Now, as for the plugin, if he had to disable this why would he add a separate plugin that would simulate part of the same thing he disabled? I think this would simply cause the same performance issues and will not be added, on the other hand we just might be surprised. Hope this clears a bit of confusion with this.
While craftbook is enabled, last i knew, IC's are disabled due to performance. Now, as for the plugin, if he had to disable this why would he add a separate plugin that would simulate part of the same thing he disabled? I think this would simply cause the same performance issues and will not be added, on the other hand we just might be surprised. Hope this clears a bit of confusion with this.
Re: Wireless redstone :D
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 11:39 pm
They're working for me on creative. Not sure about survival, though.EmberCelica wrote:Decided to snoop on forums while waiting for something and came across this.
While craftbook is enabled, last i knew, IC's are disabled due to performance. Now, as for the plugin, if he had to disable this why would he add a separate plugin that would simulate part of the same thing he disabled? I think this would simply cause the same performance issues and will not be added, on the other hand we just might be surprised. Hope this clears a bit of confusion with this.