RENMX | Forum

The Rank I'm applying for is: Architect
Server the Build was made on: Creative
My Game Name is: supermage113
My Project is called: Mageville
To get to my project: /warp mageville
A brief description of my project: I made a town that started with one little house but then I decided to add more detail and big buildings into it, after I was finished I entered it for an Architect application.
-Some of The Application Pictures are currently outdated. things are a tad different. I will add more screenshots soon.-
Three mandatory screenshots:

Now with the park and the windmill added, it looks nice! ^^

Ive seen this. after constant upgrades To it I personally think its worth Arch if you look at it in person.

You should rate it Mac ^^

I dont rate applications of real life friends.

You can provide "constructive criticism" on the applications even though he is your real life friend if you cant rate it. The beauty, uniqueness, scale and execution of the town at least.

The similar situation was Dum rating his real life friend/sibling/etc. Emme75's application.

Oh wait, it wasn't Dum who rated the application...

I do think this is worthy of arch. it wasn't when it was first uploaded but after I gave a few tips on some stuff to build he added alot. If I do recall I think super said he would expand after he gets arch and head for city planner. I don't really know how to rate and I suck at it (except Director,Artist, Apprentice) but in my opinion. it deserves arch.

Uniqueness:8
There's alot of cities in the survival & creative server, allthough this one is built by just you wich makes it somewhat special
Beauty: 7
This isnt exactly the prettiest city i've seen. You could have added some more details, maybe some mossy parts around the buildings?
Execution: 8
I like the way you made the city, the windmill looks nice and the decorations on the inside fits great!
Scale: 7
This is fairly big.

8 + 7 + 8 + 7 = 30 Points!

I saw this in-game and I disagree with this rating. I would give this 28/40. It is not yet architect worthy, please continue it and re-submit.

I'll voice my opinion, this isn't worthy of Architect due to blocky buildings, poor execution, worthless block variation and ugly planning.
Also, you can't give it extra Uniqueness points just because it's made by someone you're not used to seeing, Nor.
Uniqueness points are based on how unique the building is in itself, how many times have you seen a city on stilts for example? That is unique.
This, however, is not.
Be harsher with the ratings.

Try improving upon these faulty factors and I'd consider it worthy of Architect.
My rating, however, is not official; and you needn't take my advice.